No. 3: After the Baker Commission: What Next in Iraq?
Author(s): Daniel Möckli
Editor(s): Daniel Möckli
Series: CSS Analysis in Security Policy
Issue: 3
Publisher(s): Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich
Publication Year: 2006
|
|||||||||||

Author(s): Daniel Möckli
Editor(s): Daniel Möckli
Series: CSS Analysis in Security Policy
Issue: 3
Publisher(s): Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich
Publication Year: 2006
Iraq is descending into chaos and is at risk of becoming a failed state. The US debate on how to proceed is marked by a sense of gloom. If Iraq is to avoid a headfirst plunge into a civil war that could destabilize large parts of the Middle East, Washington has little choice but to change its strategy and, above all, regionalize the search for a political solution. Yet, while this diplomatic option figures prominently in the report of the Baker Commission, it confronts the Bush administration with difficult choices regarding its future course on Iran and Syria. If the West wants to avoid a noticeable loss of influence in the region, Europe must also become engaged more forcefully in the search for peace.
Graphics:
|
Recommendations of the Baker Commission
|
Iraq and its neighbours
|
Wichtiger Hinweis:
Diese Website wird in älteren Versionen von Netscape ohne
graphische Elemente dargestellt. Die Funktionalität der
Website ist aber trotzdem gewährleistet. Wenn Sie diese
Website regelmässig benutzen, empfehlen wir Ihnen, auf
Ihrem Computer einen aktuellen Browser zu installieren. Weitere
Informationen finden Sie auf
folgender
Seite.
Important Note:
The content in this site is accessible to any browser or
Internet device, however, some graphics will display correctly
only in the newer versions of Netscape. To get the most out of
our site we suggest you upgrade to a newer browser.
More
information