Publication
6 Oct 2010
The EU stubbornly sticks to its 20% reduction commitment (by 2020, compared to 1990), knowing that this would be insufficient on its own, under any circumstance, for reaching its self-declared objective, namely to keep the global temperature increase to 2°C. But why would China, India and other emerging economies accept stringent commitments if the US, historically the biggest emitter and still on a par with China, is unwilling to accept even a modest reduction?
Download |
English (PDF, 4 pages, 170 KB) |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Gros, Christian Egenhofer |
Series | CEPS Commentaries |
Publisher | Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) |
Copyright | © 2010 Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) |