Publication

Mar 2008

This paper examines ways to combine qualitative and quantitative models to predict political instability and mass violence. The author explains that the advent of quantitative forecasting models has led to calls for these models to replace traditional qualitative analysis. He argues, however, that policymakers and analysts should insist on a multiple-method approach, which has greater forecasting power than either the quantitative or qualitative method alone.

Download English (PDF, 16 pages, 364 KB)
Author Jack A Goldstone
Series USIP Special Reports
Issue 204
Publisher United States Institute of Peace (USIP)
Copyright © 2008 United States Institute of Peace (USIP)
JavaScript has been disabled in your browser