Publication

2010

The experience of the two crises discussed in this paper confirms the need for specificity in the framing of policy. The paper’s first two sections discuss the evolution of the response to each of these crises. The third section shows that the failings of the later plan stem at least partially from the successes of the previous one and makes some suggestions about how to overcome the current limitations of the Japanese efforts on climate change mitigation. The final section offers some conjectures as to Japan’s future approach to the international climate negotiations are offered.

Download English (PDF, 24 pages, 189 KB)
Author Alexandru Luta
Series FIIA (UPI) Working Papers
Issue 66
Publisher Finnish Institute of International Affairs (FIIA)
Copyright © 2010 Finnish Institute of International Affairs (FIIA)
JavaScript has been disabled in your browser