Publication

The need for security forces in a fragile state to be sufficiently trained and equipped is recognized as a precondition for stability and development. This usually involves the import of conventional arms, including small arms and light weapons (SALW) and ammunition. However, this paper argues that supplying arms and ammunition to security forces in fragile states does not necessarily lead to the intended goals and in a number of cases has instead contributed to armed conflict and instability. The authors use a comparative study of eight fragile states in order to gauge the impact of SALW and ammunition transfers on state stability and governance. In concluding the paper examines the lessons learned and urges major states supplying arms to adopt best practices and risk mitigation strategies.