Publication

May 2016

This paper investigates the extent to which the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) has made a difference in the way African States are governed. It ultimately concludes that 1) whether a state undergoes the review process or merely joins the mechanism does not seem to affect its performance, and 2) APRM-related progress has often been mixed (economic achievements, for example, have sometimes come at the expense of political freedoms.)

JavaScript has been disabled in your browser